Great question @Alexandria Senetra! Those of us that have transitioned from the traditional small molecule/chemical modality to newer therapeutic modalities are finding that the traditional assays to assess ADME/DMPK parameters for better PK/PD and IVIVE predictions are running into many challenging physicochemical properties with these newer modalities. Significant challenges such non-specific binding, poor solubility, or poor analytical signals, are barriers in data interpretation using traditional ADME assays. Newer mechanistic models, such as, organ-on-a-chip/Multi-organ physiologic systems (MPS), may be able to provide some more translational data than the traditional assays.
I would like to hear what other in vitro models or assays others have tried to develop to assess this gap in IVIVE.
Best regards,
Steven-
------------------------------
Steven Louie M.S.
Associate Director
Moderna
Cambridge MA
[email protected]Disclaimer: Opinions expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 04-17-2023 17:36
From: Alexandria Senetra
Subject: PPDM and Emerging Modalities
With the rapid advancement of therapeutics, new technologies and treatment modalities are being developed to meet the unique needs of patients. Personalized medicine has been evolving with the chemical modalities researchers are focusing on including gene therapy, antibody drug conjugates, next generation peptides, protein degraders, and RNA-based therapy to address "difficult" diseases. In light of this, how are you applying PPDM for emerging modalities at your current role?
------------------------------
Alexandria Senetra
PhD Student
University of Florida College of Pharmacy
Gainesville FL
[email protected]
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer.
------------------------------